Scaling Azure Infrastructure? Don’t Miss This One Risk
- Rajamohan Rajendran
- Jun 12
- 2 min read

The Overlooked Challenge in Cloud Growth
As enterprises expand their Azure footprint, one issue often goes unnoticed until it becomes a crisis:
No centralized Terraform governance.
This leads to cost overruns, inconsistent environments, and security vulnerabilities—issues that can derail even the most promising DevOps strategies.
⸻
The Real Impact of Poor IaC Governance
Without governance, here’s what we’ve seen happen across environments:
• Unpredictable cloud spend due to orphaned or duplicated resources
• Security gaps with misconfigured roles, NSGs, and open endpoints
• Messy resource tagging and naming, making reporting and accountability impossible
⸻
What Worked for Us
———————————
To overcome these challenges, our team implemented a robust Terraform governance model at scale. Here’s what we did:
⸻
1. Terraform Module Catalog
We built a versioned, reusable module catalog following Cloud Center of Excellence (CCoE) principles. Each module came with:
• Naming conventions
• Pre-set tags
• Security defaults
Modules like: azure-aks, azure-keyvault, azure-storage-account
⸻
2. Centralized GitHub Actions Pipeline
All infrastructure deployments go through a central pipeline that:
• Pulls only approved modules
• Applies standard validation and formatting
• Blocks unauthorized code or untracked resources
This avoided environment drift and shadow infrastructure.
⸻
3. Azure Policy + GitHub Checks
Governance was automated using:
• Azure Policies for runtime enforcement
• GitHub Actions for pre-deployment checks (e.g., mandatory tags, naming standards)
Result: Reduced audit issues and increased compliance.
⸻
4. Cost Controls via Log Analytics + Action Groups
We integrated Azure Monitor and Log Analytics to:
• Trigger alerts when costs exceeded budgets
• Notify stakeholders with actionable insights
• Align dev teams with financial accountability
⸻
5. Shared CI/CD Pipeline Library
We published reusable pipeline templates to enable faster adoption:
• Plan, validate, and apply stages
• Integrated with environments and role-based approvals
• Easy onboarding for new dev teams
⸻
Key Business Outcomes
—————————————
After 6 months of using this approach:
• 30% cost reduction across Azure subscriptions
• Faster onboarding of new projects
• Stronger governance and audit readiness
⸻
Final Thoughts for Cloud Leaders
As a DevOps professional, if you’re managing infra at scale, don’t wait for cost reports or security incidents to show you the cracks.
Terraform governance should be a proactive strategy, not a reactive fix.

Comments